Herman Cain was like a pompous and pretentious illiterate at a spelling bee contest. Why in the world would a man who wants to replace Obama not have an intelligible opinion on the Libyan battle?
Moreover, there is no one other than Ron Paul who has can contrast himself on foreign when matched with Obama. The criticism of Romney, Newt, Bachmann and others are weak and beside the point. Unless there is a strong contrast GOP candidates can't best Obama on foreign policy.
The GOP nonsense that Obama does not support Israel is weak. The fact is that support for Israel is bolstered by the congress. Even if a president wavered in support of Israel it would be of no consequence.
Ron Paul correctly states that toppling a dictator most often results in states that are even more dangerous to American interests. Further, there was no declaration of war and U.S. vital interests were not in play. Also, Paul is critical of the U.S. waging war because of a mandate from a foreign organization or power. Agree of disagree, Ron Paul has been the most potent critic of Obama's foreign policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment